Is allergic disease curable or transferable with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the pathogenesis of allergic asthma/rhinitis, 2 main types of cells play a role: hematolymphatic cells (mast cells, eosinophils, T cells, B cells) and nonhematolymphatic cells (airway smooth muscle cells, epithelial cells). It is not known which one of the 2 cell types plays the primary role. Here we review the literature on allergic disease transfer and potential cure with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), as transferability and curability would support a primary role of hematolymphatic cells and have implications for donor selection for HCT and possible future treatment of severe allergic disease with HCT. A total of 18 nonallergic recipients were reported to develop allergic disease after transplantation; however, conclusive information for transfer was available for only 5 cases. Allergic disease was reported to abate in 3 allergic recipients; however, conclusive information for "cure" was available for only 2 cases. Problems in interpreting the reports include incomplete data on allergic disease in the donor or recipient before transplantation, not knowing the denominator, and the lack of controls. In summary, review of the literature generates the hypothesis that allergic disease is transferable and curable with HCT. A prospective study, including appropriate controls, is needed to evaluate this hypothesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".