MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985434553 · doi:10.1002/pen.23853

Solid‐state polymerization of poly(ethylene terephthalate): Effect of organoclay concentration

2014· article· en· W1985434553 on OpenAlexafffund
Maryam Dini, Pierre J. Carreau, Musa R. Kamal, Minh‐Tan Ton‐That, Babak Esmaeili

Bibliographic record

VenuePolymer Engineering and Science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Nanocomposites and Properties
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityNational Research Council CanadaPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceOrganoclayCrystallinityNanocompositePolyethylene terephthalateExtrusionCrystallizationPolymerizationPolymer chemistryEthyleneChemical engineeringPolymerComposite materialOrganic chemistryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)/Cloisite 30B (C30B) nanocomposites of different organoclay concentrations were prepared using a water‐assisted extrusion process. The reduction of the molecular weight ( M w ) of the PET matrix, caused by hydrolysis during water‐assisted extrusion, was compensated by subsequent solid‐state polymerization (SSP). Viscometry, titration, rheological, and dynamic scanning calorimetry measurements were used to analyze the samples from SSP. The weight‐average molecular weight ( M w ) of PET increased significantly through SSP. PET nanocomposites exhibited solid‐like rheological behavior, and the complex viscosity at high frequencies was scaled with the M w of PET. The Maron–Pierce model was used to evaluate the M w of PET in the nanocomposites before and after SSP. It was found that the extent and the rate of the SSP reaction in nanocomposites were lower than those for the neat PETs, due to the barrier effect of clay platelets. Consequently, the SSP rate of PET increased with decreasing particle size for the neat PET and PET nanocomposites. The effect of the M w of PET on the crystallization temperature, crystallinity, and the half‐time, t ½ , of nonisothermal crystallization was also investigated. With increasing M w of PET, t ½ increased, whereas T c and X c decreased. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 54:2925–2937, 2014. © 2014 Society of Plastics Engineers

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.439

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolymer Engineering and ScienceSame topicPolymer Nanocomposites and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207