Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head After Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Case report. OBJECTIVE: To report a previously undescribed complication of lumbar spinal surgery under prolonged hypotensive anesthesia. BACKGROUND DATA: Avascular necrosis of bone most commonly affects the femoral head. The etiology of the condition is understood in only 75% of cases. There have been no prior reports of this condition following lumbar spine surgery carried out under hypotensive anesthetic. METHODS: Notes review, clinical examination, plain radiographs, and magnetic resonance imaging diagnosed three patients who developed avascular necrosis of the femoral heads (five joints in total) after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. All three were treated with total hip replacement (five joints), and the diagnosis of avascular necrosis was confirmed in two by histopathological examination. RESULTS: All three patients have recovered full mobility following hip replacement surgery. None had any residual symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis or hip disease, and none of them had shown any clinical evidence of avascular necrosis in any other bone. CONCLUSIONS: The development of avascular necrosis of the femoral heads following surgery for spinal stenosis may be due to hypotensive anesthesia, prone positioning on a Montreal mattress, or a combination of the two. Careful intraoperative positioning may reduce the risk of this occurring after spinal surgery. However, close postoperative surveillance and a high index of suspicion of worsening hip pathology in patients who appear to mobilize poorly after lumbar spinal surgery may be the only method of early detection and treatment for this condition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".