Single phosphorylation of Tyr304 in the cytoplasmic tail of ephrin B2 confers high‐affinity and bifunctional binding to both the SH2 domain of Grb4 and the PDZ domain of the PDZ‐RGS3 protein
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The B class cell-attached ephrins mediate contact-dependent cell-cell communications and transduce the contact signals to the host cells through the binding interactions of their cytoplasmic domains. Two classes of intracellular effectors of B ephrins have been identified: one contains the PSD-95/Dlg/ZO-1 (PDZ) domain (for example PDZ-RGS3), and the second the Src homology 2 (SH2) domain (e.g. the Grb4 adaptor protein). The interaction with Grb4 requires phosphorylation of tyrosine residues on the conserved cytoplasmic C-terminal region of B ephrins, while binding to the PDZ domain is independent of tyrosine phosphorylation. However, the exact phosphorylation site(s) required for signaling remained obscure and it is also unknown whether the two classes of effectors can bind to B ephrins simultaneously or if the binding of one affects the binding of the other. We report here that phosphorylation of Tyr304 in the functional C-terminal region (residues 301-333) of ephrin B2 confers high-affinity binding to the SH2 domain of the Grb4 protein. Tyrosine phosphorylation at other candidate sites resulted in only minor change of the binding of Tyr304-phosphorylated ephrin B peptide (i.e. ephrinB2(301-333)-pY304) with the SH2 domain. (1)H-(15)N NMR HSQC experiments show that only the ephrinB2(301-333)-pY304 peptide forms a stable and specific binding complex with the SH2 domain of Grb4. The SH2 and PDZ domains were found to bind to the Tyr304 phosphopeptide both independently and at the same time, forming a three-component molecular complex. Taken together, our studies identify a novel SH2 domain binding motif, PHpY304EKV, on the cytoplasmic domains of B ephrins that may be essential for reverse signaling via the Grb4 adaptor protein alone or in concert with proteins containing PDZ domains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".