Suppression of <i>DPYD</i> expression in RKO Cells via DNA methylation in the regulatory region of the <i>DPYD</i> promoter: a potentially important epigenetic mechanism regulating <i>DPYD</i> expression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is one of the factors that determine the efficacy and toxicity of 5-fluorouracil. Variations in DPD activity may result from alterations at the transcriptional level of the DPYD gene. Heterogeneity in DPYD expression has been reported, but the molecular mechanisms responsible for this remain unclear. We investigated methylation of the DPYD promoter as a mechanism for transcriptional regulation of DPYD in the RKO colorectal cancer cell line. We demonstrate that the active transcription machinery for DPYD is present in RKO cells, but promoter binding of Sp1, a transactivator of DPYD, was inhibited, which on subsequent examination was shown to be associated with dense promoter methylation. Treatment with 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine alone or the combination of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine and trichostatin A induced demethylation of the promoter and markedly increased the DPYD mRNA level in RKO cells but not in unmethylated WiDr cells. Furthermore, in vitro methylation of the DPYD promoter decreased promoter activity. These data suggest an important role for methylation in DPYD suppression. The transcriptional suppression of DPYD by methylation may be responsible for the increased 5-fluorouracil sensitivity observed in some patients. This may also provide insight into the mechanism underlying the downregulation of DPYD in some colorectal cancers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".