MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985641040 · doi:10.1080/00016480701840122

The roles of local inhibition mediated by γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-A receptor in duration tuning in the inferior colliculus of guinea pigs

2008· article· en· W1985641040 on OpenAlexaff
Shankai Yin, Zhengnong Chen, Yanmei Feng, Jian Wang, Shankai Yin, Zhengnong Chen, Jian Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Oto-Laryngologica · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInferior colliculusDuration (music)Aminobutyric acidGuinea pigGABAA receptorNeuroscienceSuperior colliculusReceptorGABAB receptorgamma-Aminobutyric acidGABA receptorChemistryAudiologyBiologyMedicineEndocrinologyNucleusBiochemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CONCLUSION: GABA-mediated inhibition is responsible for the duration tuning in the inferior colliculus (IC) of guinea pigs, a non-echo-locating mammal. Duration tuning in this species is better demonstrated in an appropriate short time window. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the role of GABA-mediated inhibition in duration tuning of neurons in the IC of guinea pigs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Duration tuning pattern was recorded by measuring the spikes of single neurons in response to broadband noise of different durations. The effect of GABA-mediated inhibition was verified by comparing the responses with and without the use of the GABA-A receptor blocker bicuculline (BIC), which was applied using micro-iontophoresis. RESULTS: In addition to overall increase in responsiveness, the application of BIC was found to significantly reduce or eliminate the duration selectivity in 44 of the 67 neurons that showed clear duration tuning from a sample of total 340 neurons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score0.581

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Oto-LaryngologicaSame topicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsFrench-language works237,207