MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985646024 · doi:10.1071/hr09006

Geoffrey Donald Thorburn 1930–1996

2009· article· en· W1985646024 on OpenAlexaff
Graham Jenkin, John Challis, Jeffrey S. Robinson, I. R. Young

Bibliographic record

VenueHistorical Records of Australian Science · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsMichael Smith Health Research BC
FundersMonash UniversityUniversity of New South WalesCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
KeywordsBiographyObituaryOfficerHistory of scienceMemoirPhysiologyGerontologyClassicsHistoryMedicineArt historyLawPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Professor Geoffrey Donald Thorburn AO passed away on 28 October 1996. He graduated in Medicine from the University of Sydney in 1956 and began his scientific career as a cardiovascular-renal physiologist. His career, in which he undertook pioneering research and teaching in many fields of physiology, spanned 35 years and three continents. He is recognised internationally as one of the founders of contemporary fetal physiology research. He was Head of the Department of Physiology at Monash University from 1981 until his retirement in 1995, but continued active research right up until his death. He was made an Officer of the Order of Australia in 1995 'for service to medicine and research in the field of fetal physiology'. Geoff was a wonderful mentor and friend to all who were touched by him. He was an outstanding scientist and academic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.111

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistorical Records of Australian ScienceSame topicBirth, Development, and HealthFrench-language works237,207