An Extinction Threshold for Protostellar Cores in Ophiuchus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have observed continuum emission at λ = 850 μm over ~4 deg 2 of the Ophiuchus star-forming cloud using the Submillimeter Common-User Bolometric Array on the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope, producing a submillimeter continuum map 20 times larger than previous Ophiuchus surveys. Our sensitivity is 40 mJy beam -1 , a factor of ~2 less sensitive than earlier maps. Using an automated identification algorithm, we detect 100 candidate objects. Only two new objects are detected outside the boundary of previous maps, despite the much wider area surveyed. We compare the submillimeter continuum map with a map of visual extinction across the Ophiuchus cloud derived using a combination of Two Micron All Sky Survey and R -band data. The total mass in submillimeter objects is ≈50 M ☉ compared with ≈2000 M ☉ in observed cloud mass estimated from the extinction. The submillimeter objects represent only 2.5% of the cloud mass. A clear association is seen between the locations of detected submillimeter objects and high visual extinction, with no objects detected at A V < 7 mag. Using the extinction map, we estimate pressures within the cloud from P / k ≈ 2 × 10 5 cm -3 K in the less-extincted regions to P / k ≈ 2 × 10 6 cm -3 K at the cloud center. Given our sensitivities, cold ( T d ≈ 15 K) clumps supported by thermal pressure, had they existed, should have been detected throughout the majority of the map. Such objects may not be present at low A V because they may form only where A V > 15, by some mechanism (e.g., loss of nonthermal support).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".