MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985654063 · doi:10.1139/p02-088

Nonvariational and nonadiabatic calculations on the hydrogen molecular ion and its µ <sup></sup> isotopes

2002· article· en· W1985654063 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
V L Yakhontov, Martin Jungen

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
KeywordsPhysicsHamiltonian (control theory)Bound stateBorn–Oppenheimer approximationIonEigenvalues and eigenvectorsRotational–vibrational spectroscopyAtomic physicsQuantum mechanicsMoleculeClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A nonadiabatic, nonvariational, and computationally inexpensive scheme to describe bound and continuum states of three-body molecular ions, including µ – -mesonic ions, is proposed. The method relies on treating perturbatively the nonadiabatic coupling between the Born–Oppenheimer (BO) particle states and nuclear motion terms, such that the appropriate expansion parameter is the mass ratio of the lightest particle in the system to that of the heaviest one. In practice, the method requires solving, numerically, a system of coupled inhomogeneous Schrödinger equations with effective potentials that depend on the "internuclear" separation, R, and allow for the mixing of BO states because of nonadiabatic terms in the Hamiltonian. The utility of our approach is clearly evidenced by the results of the numerical calculations carried out for rovibrational states of several lowest J in the H + 2 and (ppµ – ) molecules. These demonstrate that nonadiabatic eigenenergies and eigenstates, both of the bound and scattering type, for ordinary as well as µ-mesonic molecules can be directly and quite accurately calculated from the same principles in the entire range of R, without making use of the variational techniques that more sophisticated studies of this kind are usually based on. PACS Nos.: 31.15Ar, 31.15Pf

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.669
Threshold uncertainty score0.401

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207