The Lower Cretaceous Chaswood Formation in southern New Brunswick: provenance and tectonics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The most northwesterly outcrop of Lower Cretaceous Chaswood Formation is in a pit at Vinegar Hill, south of Sussex, New Brunswick. New mapping and boreholes show thick, fluvial, loosely lithified conglomerates and lesser sandstones unconformably overlying 12 m of mudstone in a 1 km2 basin bounded to the northwest by the Clover Hill fault. Sparse paleocurrent indicators to the southwest parallel this fault. The tectonic setting is similar to that of the Chaswood Formation in the fault-bounded Elmsvale basin in Nova Scotia. In both cases, a basal unit is paraconformable on underlying upper Mississippian rocks, was folded into a syncline within which a middle unit accumulated and was further deformed, and is capped by thin flat-lying sandstone and conglomerate. The tectonic style of the Chaswood Formation at Vinegar Hill demonstrates that early Cretaceous deformation was widespread in the southern Maritimes. Gravel clasts consist overwhelmingly of vein quartz, but sparse lithic clasts match source rocks in south-central New Brunswick. Heavy minerals are mostly ilmenite (40%–70%) and staurolite (20%–40%), with monazite, zircon, and andalusite more abundant than at other Chaswood Formation localities. Heavy mineral chemistry and monazite geochronology suggest a provenance from Silurian metasedimentary rocks and tourmaline granites in central New Brunswick. Different mineral assemblages from the Chaswood Formation in Nova Scotia suggest that an ancestral St. John River drained western New Brunswick and supplied sediment to the Shelburne delta of the Scotian basin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".