MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1985670005 · doi:10.1167/11.11.1241

Working memory representations of visual motion direction are encoded in the firing patterns of neurons in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, but not in area MT

2011· article· en· W1985670005 on OpenAlexaff
D. Mendoza, Julio Martínez-Trujillo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vision · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorking memoryNeuroscienceDorsolateral prefrontal cortexPsychologyReceptive fieldVisual cortexStimulus (psychology)Prefrontal cortexVisual memoryCognitionCognitive psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is thought that primate dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) neurons play a role in the maintenance of visual information in working memory (Goldman-Rakic, 1995). It has been recently suggested that this process also involves the recruitment of neurons in early visual cortex that are selective for the stimulus features to be remembered. Supporting this hypothesis, recent fMRI studies have reported that the contents of visual working memory can be decoded from patterns of BOLD signals in visual areas (Harrison and Tong, 2009). However, because fMRI does not directly measure the neurons' spiking activity, it remains controversial whether this effect is attributable to variations in the firing patterns of neurons, or in the amplitude of other signals such as local field potentials. Here, we investigate this issue by recording the spiking activity of single neurons simultaneously from the dlPFC (n = 53) and early visual area MT (n = 33) of two rhesus monkeys during a working memory task requiring them to remember the motion direction of a sample random dot pattern and match it to the direction of one of two test patterns serially presented inside the neurons' receptive field. During the memory period, the activity of most dlPFC remained above or below baseline, and approximately 1/6 of the neurons showed sustained tuning to the remembered direction. In all of the recorded MT neurons, activity remained at baseline levels and direction tuning was not present throughout the memory period. Our results show that working memory representations of motion direction are encoded in the firing patterns of neurons in dlPFC but not in MT. They further suggest that the reported patterns of BOLD activation in visual cortex reflecting the contents of working memory may originate from changes in other signals such as local field potentials rather than spiking activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vision→Same topicNeural dynamics and brain function→French-language works237,207→