MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985780560 · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(01)00276-7

Topical bicuculline to the rat spinal cord induces highly localized allodynia that is mediated by spinal prostaglandins

2001· article· en· W1985780560 on OpenAlexafffund
Zizhen Zhang, Michael P. Hefferan, Christopher W. Loomis

Bibliographic record

VenuePain · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersMedical Research CouncilCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchPromotion and Mutual Aid Corporation for Private Schools of JapanRick Hansen Institute
KeywordsAllodyniaBicucullineSpinal cordMedicineAnesthesiaLaminectomyHindlimbGABAA receptorNociceptionEndocrinologyInternal medicineHyperalgesiaReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study was to investigate the allodynic effect of bicuculline (BIC) given topically to the dorsal surface of the rat spinal cord, and to determine if spinal prostaglandins (PGs) mediate the allodynic state arising from spinal GABA(A)-receptor blockade. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (325-400 g) were anaesthetized with halothane and maintained with urethane for the continuous monitoring of blood pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR) and cortical electroencephalogram (EEG). A laminectomy was performed to expose the dorsal surface of the spinal cord. Unilateral application of BIC (0.1 microg in 0.1 microl) to the L5 or L6 spinal segment induced a highly localized allodynia (e.g. one or two digits) on the ipsilateral hind paw. Thus, hair deflection (brushing the hair with a cotton-tipped applicator) in the presence, but not absence of BIC, evoked an increase in MAP and HR, abrupt motor responses (MR; e.g. withdrawal of the hind leg, kicking, and/or scratching) on the affected side, and desynchrony of the EEG. BIC-allodynia was dose-dependent, yielding ED(50)'s (95% CI's) of 45 ng (31-65) for MAP; 68 ng (46-101) for HR and 76 ng (60-97) for MR. Allodynia was sustained for up to 2 h with repeated BIC application without any detectable change in the location or area of peripheral sensitization. Pretreatment with either the EP(1)- receptor antagonist, SC-51322, the cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 selective inhibitor, NS-398, or the NMDA-receptor antagonist, AP-7, inhibited BIC-allodynia in a dose-dependent manner. The results demonstrate: (a) BIC, applied to the dorsal surface of the spinal cord, induces highly localized allodynia; (b) this effect can be sustained with repeated BIC application; (c) it is evoked by NMDA-dependent afferent input; (d) spinal PGs are synthesized by constitutive COX-2 during BIC-allodynia; and (e) spinal PGs contribute to the abnormal processing of tactile input via spinal EP1-receptors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePainSame topicPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207