MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985838071 · doi:10.4271/2012-01-2126

Generic Architecture for a Self-Powered Smart Sensor Interface in Avionic Application

2012· article· en· W1985838071 on OpenAlexafffund
Saeid Hashemi

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE International Journal of Aerospace · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAvionicsArchitectureInterface (matter)Computer scienceComputer architectureEngineeringEmbedded systemSystems engineeringHuman–computer interactionAerospace engineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">In this paper, we present a universal architecture for a reliable self-powered Smart Sensor Interface (SSI) in avionic applications. The SSI module consists of data acquisition and signal excitation paths. The power recovery unit harvests energy from data field bus to power up the SSI module entirely. Using integrated CMOS technologies, the interface is flexible and configurable to be integrated with and fully controlled by Transducer Interface Module (TIM) introduced in IEEE1451 standard. Employing data converters within the signal paths makes the SSI well suited for full digital control over specifications of the excitation signal and data processing algorithms. The interface can be used along with various types of position sensors including legacy R/LVDT, MEMS-based and optical ones. The analog parts of the SSI are implemented using IBM 0.13 μm CMOS process while its digital modules are realized in FPGAs. The Power Conversion Chain (PCC) of the SSI is also presented and its complex components are modeled in Verilog-A using a top-down modeling approach. The models make it possible to study over power transfer and distribution throughout the SSI. Simulation results prove that the proposed power recovery scheme could procure and deliver significant amount of power to SSI which makes the structure self-powered.</div></div>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.800
Threshold uncertainty score0.545

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAE International Journal of AerospaceSame topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207