Geochemistry and toxicity of aluminum in the saguenay river, québec, Canada, in relation to discharges from an aluminum smelter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The transformation of bauxite to alumina, the first step in the production of metallic aluminum (Al), generates Al-rich effluents. One installation is located near Jonquière (QC, Canada), with the effluents being discharged into the Saguenay River. We undertook an integrated geochemical and ecotoxicological study to determine if these Al discharges affected the receiving water. In the spring, summer, and autumn of 1997, samples of river water were collected from stations upstream and downstream of the effluent outfalls and from a regional reference site. Samples were analyzed for Al (e.g., particulate and dissolved Al, total monomeric and organic monomeric Al, dissolved polymeric Al) and for parameters known to affect Al speciation (pH, SO4, fluoride, dissolved organic carbon). Parallel samples were used for ambient toxicity tests with fathead minnow and Ceriodaphnia dubia. Concentrations of total Al (231-596 μg/L) and dissolved Al (112-344 μg/L) at downstream stations were 1.1 to 3.7 times higher than those at the station immediately upstream. Average levels of total and dissolved Al exceeded the Québec provincial criterion of 87 (μ acid-recoverable Al/L, even at sites upstream of the plant. Inorganic monomeric Al at downstream stations ranged from 22 to 88 (μ/L. With the exception of a single elevated value observed at one downstream site, inorganic monomeric Al levels were> 75 μg/L. Other studies in soft neutral-pH waters have shown that no toxic effects occur at this concentration of inorganic monomeric Al. None of the river water samples from stations 300 m downstream from the outfalls caused significant toxicity to C. dubia or fathead minnows. We suggest that expressing guidelines as monomeric inorganic Al would offer a more useful basis for comparison with ambient Al concentrations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".