Relating drug-induced changes in carotid artery mechanics to cardiovagal and sympathetic baroreflex control
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous evidence indicates that sensitivity of the baroreflex cardiovagal and sympathetic arms is dissociated. In addition, pharmacologic assessment of baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) has revealed that cardiovagal, but not sympathetic, BRS is greater when blood pressure is increasing versus falling. The origin of this hysteresis is unknown. In this study, carotid artery distensibility and absolute distension (diameter) were assessed to test the hypothesis that vessel mechanics in barosensitive regions affect the BRS of cardiovagal, but not sympathetic, outflow. R-R interval (i.e. time between successive R waves), finger arterial blood pressure, muscle sympathetic nerve activity, and carotid artery dimensions (B-mode imaging) were measured during sequential infusions of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and phenylephrine (PHE). Systolic and diastolic common carotid artery diameters and pulse pressure were recorded to calculate distensibility of this vessel under each drug condition. Cardiovagal BRS was greater when blood pressure was increasing versus decreasing (p < 0.01). Sympathetic BRS was not affected by direction of pressure change. Distensibility did not differ between SNP and PHE injections. However, compared with SNP, infusion of PHE resulted in larger absolute systolic and diastolic carotid diameters (p < 0.001). Therefore, cardiovagal reflex hysteresis was related to drug-induced changes in common carotid artery diameter but not distensibility. The lack of sympathetic hysteresis in this model suggests a relative insensitivity of this baroreflex component to carotid artery dimensions and provides a possible mechanism for the dissociation between cardiovagal and sympathetic BRS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".