MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986001146 · doi:10.7202/705992ar

Growth inhibition of rhizobia isolated from arctic legumes (Astragalus and Oxytropis spp.) and sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) by sainfoin seed diffusates

2005· article· en· W1986001146 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
D. Prévost, D. K. Jain, L. M. Bordeleau

Bibliographic record

VenuePhytoprotection · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLegume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRhizobiaBiologyNitrogen fixationLegumeInoculationAgronomyAgarBotanyHorticultureBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cold-adapted arctic rhizobia (from Astragalus and Oxytropis species ) were used in nodulation studies and field inoculation trials with a temperate forage legume, sainfoin ( Onobrychis viciifolia ), since they have the potential to improve symbiotic nitrogen fixation at low temperatures. A major concern in legume inoculation is the toxicity of seed and root tannins to rhizobia. We studied the effects of sainfoin seed diffusates on the growth of 47 arctic and 2 sainfoin strains of rhizobia. Growth of all tested strains on yeast-extract mannitol agar plate was inhibited to various degrees by sainfoin seed diffusates. There was no correlation between the zone of inhibition and the symbiotic effectiveness of each strain on sainfoin. However, growth inhibition was totally reversed by the addition of iron as Fe-EDTA in the agar medium. In liquid medium without iron, growth inhibition of an arctic strain was 94% after 4-day growth. With the addition of 100 µM Fe-EDTA, inhibition was only 5%, and with 100 µM Fe-citrate, 76 %. These results underline the importance of evaluating the toxicity effect under normal rhizospheric conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.352
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhytoprotectionSame topicLegume Nitrogen Fixing SymbiosisFrench-language works237,207