Activity and safety of sunitinib in combination with trastuzumab for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer: initial results from a phase II study.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Abstract #4115 Background: Sunitinib (SU) is an oral, multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFRs, PDGFRs, KIT, RET, FLT3, and CSF-1R, with proven single-agent activity in pts with advanced BC. Trastuzumab (T) is indicated as both monotherapy for second-line treatment and in combination with taxane-based therapies for first-line treatment of metastatic BC. This study investigates the activity and safety/tolerability of SU administered in combination with T in pts with advanced, HER2+ BC. Materials and methods: Eligible pts have unresectable, locally recurrent or metastatic HER2+ BC. Pts received SU at a starting dose of 37.5 mg/d po continuous daily dosing (CDD). T was administered iv wkly (loading 4 mg/kg then wkly 2 mg/kg) or q3w (loading 8 mg/kg then 6 mg/kg q3w). Due to changes in standard of care, the trial was amended from a randomized, placebo controlled design, to a single-arm study, and eligibility criteria were changed to allow inclusion of pts who had previously received CT in the first-line setting. Previous treatment with T (± lapatinib) was also permitted. The planned sample size is 53 pts and the primary endpoint is ORR. Results: In this ongoing trial, a total of 49 pts have been enrolled to date (6 pts under the original protocol and 43 under the amendment). All 43 pts enrolled under the amendment were evaluable for safety/tolerability, and antitumor activity, measured by RECIST. As of May 2008, 25 pts continue on study and 18 have discontinued, 4 due to AEs. Pts started a total of 167 cycles of treatment with a median of 4 cycles/pt (range: 1–8). The planned dose of SU (37.5 mg/d) was maintained in 31/43 pts (72%). It was reduced to 25 mg/d in 12/43 pts (28%). One pt achieved a CR and 10 a PR. SD occurred in 20 pts and PD in 6 pts. This translated into an ORR of 26% (95% CI, 13.5–41.2) and a clinical benefit rate of 35% (95% CI, 21.0–50.9). Median PFS was 25.3 wks (95% CI, 19.3–32.0). The most common treatment-related AEs were diarrhea (55.8%), asthenia (48.8%) and hypertension (37.2%) of which most were G1 or 2. The most frequent G3 AEs were neutropenia (14%) and asthenia (11.6%). There were 2 treatment-related G4 events: thrombocytopenia (2.3%) and LVEF decline (2.3%). There was 1 treatment-related G5 AE (cardiogenic shock). Conclusions: SU 37.5 mg/d on a CDD schedule in combination with T (wkly or q3w) appears to have a manageable safety profile and antitumor activity in pts previously treated for advanced HER2+ BC. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 4115.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".