MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986020662 · doi:10.1021/ma0502452

Synthesis and Characterization of Water-Soluble Cationic and Anionic Polythionylphosphazene Polyelectrolytes

2005· article· en· W1986020662 on OpenAlexafffund
Zhuo Wang, Ian Manners

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLuminescence and Fluorescent Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCationic polymerizationPolyelectrolyteChemistryPolymer chemistryPolymerRutheniumPolymerizationAmine gas treatingRing-opening polymerizationAnionic addition polymerizationCovalent bondOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Convenient synthesis of a range of water-soluble polythionylphosphazene polyelectrolytes is reported. Facile reaction of 3-(dimethylamino)propylamines with the substitutionally labile poly(chlorothionylphosphazene) 2, which is generated via thermal ring-opening polymerization of the cyclic thionylphosphazene 1, afforded the water-soluble polymer 5 . The cationic polymer 6 was obtained upon quaternization of the dimethylamino groups in polymer 5 in the presence of dimethyl sulfate. The luminescent cationic polymer 7 was prepared through the covalent attachment of 30 mol % loading of an amino-functionalized ruthenium phenanthroline complex in the polythionylphosphazene side chains. The anionic polymeric precursor 14 was synthesized via substitution reactions of poly(chlorothionylphosphazene) 2 with amine 12 . Upon removal of the protective silyl groups, the anionic polythionylphosphazene 15 was obtained. All three polyelectrolytes 6, 7, and 15 were readily soluble in water, making them potentially useful materials for a range of applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromoleculesSame topicLuminescence and Fluorescent MaterialsFrench-language works237,207