The field defects of anterior temporal lobectomy: a quantitative reassessment of Meyer's loop
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Temporal lobectomy is often complicated by superior quadrantanopia. The relation of field loss to sagittal resection length can inform us about the functional anatomy of Meyer's loop, with ramifications for surgical planning. However, the literature has produced highly variable results. We studied 29 patients with anterior temporal lobectomies using Goldmann perimetry. 24 patients had post-operating neuroimaging, with which we assessed resection length relative to each patient's temporo-occipital dimensions. For the field defect we calculated the proportion of area lost for three isopters. We found a significant correlation between resection size and field loss for both nasal and temporal defects. Linear regressions suggested an anterior limit of Meyer's loop at 24 to 28 mm from the anterior temporal pole, and involvement of the lower quadrant when resections reached 70 to 79 mm, with significant inter-subject variability. The nasal defect was 15% greater than the temporal defect for all degrees of quadrantanopia, with no difference between right and left hemispheres. Macular involvement began when field defects reached 61% of quadrant area, corresponding to a resection of about 58 mm. Patterns of field loss showed that the lower margins were most often horizontal or with a slight slope towards fixation, rather than true wedge defects. We conclude that field loss is related to resection length and that Meyer's loop extends more anteriorly than estimated in traditional surgical studies, in agreement with modern MRI and dissection studies. The patterns of field loss support a revised retinotopic model in which the most anterior fibers of Meyer's loop represent the superior field, not the vertical meridian as traditionally proposed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".