Polyhalogenated Carbazoles in Sediments of Lake Michigan: A New Discovery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previously unknown halogenated compounds were detected during the analysis of halogenated flame retardants in two sediment cores collected from Lake Michigan. Gas chromatography coupled with high- or low-resolution mass spectrometry (MS) was used to determine the chemical structures for a total of 15 novel polyhalogenated carbazoles (PHCs) with the general molecular formula C12H9-x-y-zNClxBryIz. On the basis of the mass spectra generated by electron impact (EI) and electron capture negative ionization (ECNI) MS, eight PHCs were tentatively identified as polybrominated carbazoles, while the others were mixed halogenated carbazoles containing, in addition to bromine, either chlorine or iodine or both. Patterns of halogen substitution of PHCs included Br2 to Br5, ClBr2, ClBr3, ClBr4, ClBr3I, Br4I, and Br3I2. 3,6-Dibromocarbazole and 1,3,6,8-tetrabromocarbazole were also found among the PHCs. Profiles of the concentration versus depth of sediment at the two sites showed various patterns among polybrominated carbazoles. The abundance of mixed halogenated carbazoles peaked at depths of 12-16 cm, remained at relatively constant levels in deeper sediment, but declined markedly in more recently deposited sediments. This is the first study discovering the seven mixed halogenated carbazoles in the environment. Detailed methods for their detection and identification are provided.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".