MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986088633 · doi:10.1139/v00-065

An exploratory ab initio study on the conformations of ethylguanidine in its neutral [CH<sub>3</sub>-CH<sub>2</sub>-NH-C(=NH)NH<sub>2</sub>] and protonated [CH<sub>3</sub>-CH<sub>2</sub>-NH-C(NH<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>] forms

2000· article· en· W1986088633 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
M.L. Mak, Salvatore J. Salpietro, Ricardo D. Enriz, Imre G. Csizmadia

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCrystallography and molecular interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Cancer InstituteNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryAb initioProtonationComputational chemistryCrystallographyAb initio quantum chemistry methodsGuanidineLone pairIonSide chainStereochemistryMoleculeOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To explore the conformation intricacies of the guanidine group in the arginine side chain, ab initio computations have been carried out with ethylguanidine and the ethyl guanidinium ion. HF computations have been performed using 3-21G and 6-31G basis sets and DFT calculations were carried out at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level of theory. The ethyl guanidinium ion has a single isomer due to its internal symmetry, although this structure has at least three conformations. However, several structures were found and optimized for ethylguanidine, involving the endo- and exo- orientation of the lone NH and torsional angle χ 6 , as well as the torsional modes associated with χ 4 and χ 5 . Torsional angle χ 5 gives rise to s-cis and s-trans structures.Key words: ethylguanidine, ethylguanidinium ion, ab initio MO, arginine side-chain, conformational analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0030.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2000
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicCrystallography and molecular interactionsFrench-language works237,207