Aerobiological survey of<i>Alnus</i>pollen in Ourense (N.W. Iberian Peninsula), 1993–2000
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alnus pollen is one of the major components of the aeropalynological spectra during winters in Ourense, with maximum values registered in January and February.This work analyses the intra-and interannual variations within the period 1993 -2000, when a volumetric Hirst spore-trap (LANZONI VPPS 2000) was in continuous operation.Statistically significant differences between periods 1996/97 (with a few rainy days), 1998/99, and all the others were observed.The relationships between atmosphere pollen content and the most important meteorological parameters within the same period were studied by means of correlation analysis.Temperature was the most important factor explaining the presence of Alnus pollen in the air.A Scheffe's test was carried out before the correlation analysis to establish years corresponding to the same statistical population.The results obtained from both tests were used for a regression analysis to establish the prediction patterns for this taxon.Even when a negative correlation coefficient was presented, the influence of this parameter did not decline.Previous temperatures in the main pollination period, however, were a determinant factor predicting the onset and intensity of Alnus flowering.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it