MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986106549 · doi:10.1186/1532-429x-16-s1-p157

T1 and T2 mapping detect myocardial edema after repeated 200J electrical cardioversion

2014· article· en· W1986106549 on OpenAlexaff
Dominik P. Guensch, Janelle Yu, Kady Fischer, Gobinath Nadeshalingam, Matthias G. Friedrich

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAngiologyElectrical cardioversionCardiologyInternal medicineCardioversionEdemaAtrial fibrillation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrical defibrillation and cardioversion are important and sometimes life-saving interventions. However, it remains controversial whether the intervention itself can significantly damage the heart. Myocardial edema is an early feature of myocardial injury that can be visualized by T2-weighted sequences. Newer approaches utilize T2 as well as T1 mapping techniques. We used T1 and T2 mapping to detect edema as a marker for defibrillation injury. Using a 3T clinical MRI system, we assessed 10 anesthetized pigs at baseline and hourly for 5 hours after 5 consecutive synchronized transthoracic shocks of 200J and acquired images for T1 maps (MOLLI, modified look-locker inversion recovery) and T2 maps in three short-axis planes; basal, mid and apical. Six pigs undergoing the same protocol yet without shocks served as controls. After euthanasia and explantation of the hearts, tissue samples were obtained from regions of interest (ROI) defined by positive CMR results. Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) stains of these samples were then assessed for intercellular and interstitial edema using randomly sampled planimetry. In all 10 pigs undergoing shocks, we observed myocardial injury, which was located in the anterior and inferior wall (n = 8), septal and inferior segments (n = 1) or septal and lateral segments (n = 1). In T1 and T2 maps, myocardial edema was predominantly observed in the basal slices. T2 was significantly increased from baseline at the first hour and at hours 3-5 by up to 4.2 ± 0.9% (p < 0.05, Figure 2 ) on a whole heart analysis, while T2 dropped in the remote myocardium (max. -2.6 ± 1.2%, n.s.) and in the control pigs (max. -6.1 ± 0.7%, p = 0.02). On a slice by slice analysis the maximal increase was 11.3 ± 3.9% in the basal slice (p < 0.05). T1 was increased in affected ROI at 3 and 4 h post shock (3.8 ± 0.4% and 5.0 ± 0.3% p < 0.01). Histology data showed that myocardial cell area increased by 185.65% (p = 0.016) while interstitial area was expanded 953.06% compared to healthy control myocardium (p = 0.016) in regions being deemed injured by either T1 or T2 maps. Both, cell area and interstitial space were correlated to T1 (ms) in ROI (r = 0.6/p = 0.04 and r = 0.44/p = 0.037, respectively). T1 and T2 maps at baseline before (left) and 5 h after cardioversion (right) of 5 × 200J, The T2 maps show a T2 increase in the right pectoral muscle, the anterior RV and the septum . The T1 maps exhibit the location of the defibrillation pads and global T1 increase in the LV. Mean ± SEM change of T2 in regions of interest (ROI), remote myocardium of defibrillated pigs and in the myocardium of control pigs in the whole heart based analysis (*p < 0.05 ROI vs. Remote) . Repeated cardioversion/defibrillation consistently leads to cellular and interstitial myocardial and skeletal edema, which can be visualized by T1 mapping and T2 mapping.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic ResonanceSame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207