Approximating K‐means‐type Clustering via Semidefinite Programming
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One of the fundamental clustering problems is to assign n points into k clusters based on minimal sum‐of‐squared distances (MSSC), which is known to be NP‐hard. In this paper, by using matrix arguments, we first model MSSC as a so‐called 0‐1 semidefinite programming (SDP) problem. We show that our 0‐1 SDP model provides a unified framework for several clustering approaches such as normalized k‐cut and spectral clustering. Moreover, the 0‐1 SDP model allows us to solve the underlying problem approximately via the linear programming and SDP relaxations. Second, we consider the issue of how to extract a feasible solution of the original 0‐1 SDP model from the optimal solution of the relaxed SDP problem. By using principal component analysis, we develop a rounding procedure to construct a feasible partitioning from a solution of the relaxed problem. In our rounding procedure, we need to solve a K‐means clustering problem in $\Re^{k-1}$, which can be done in $O(n^{k^2-2k+2})$ time. In case of biclustering, the running time of our rounding procedure can be reduced to $O(n\log n)$. We show that our algorithm provides a 2–approximate solution to the original problem. Promising numerical results for biclustering based on our new method are reported.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it