Thermal, mechanical, and thermo‐mechanical properties of thermosets produced using low <i>M</i><sub><i>w</i></sub> functionalized polyolefins and polyamines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Thermosets obtained by reacting highly functionalized maleic anhydride‐grafted polyethylene and a polyetherdiamine at several NH2/MA molar ratios were characterized for their gel content, thermal, mechanical, and thermo‐mechanical behavior. Gel content varied with composition and a maximum (57%) observed when NH2/MA molar ratio was 1.5. Two melting transitions were observed for thermosets, representing the semicrystalline polyethylene fraction in the gel and sol part of the material in contrast to a single transition for the starting polyethylene. Overall crosslinking suppressed the crystallinity of the polyethylene in the thermoset. A single Tg observed in the DMA analysis suggested phase mixing between the polyethylene and polyether chains. A shift in the Tg observed was related to the degree of crosslinking in the thermosets. Tensile properties of the thermosets were observed to be a strong function of composition and the degree of crosslinking and the optimum mechanical performance was shown by thermosets when NH2/MA molar ratio was 1.5 and 2.0. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".