74 GERM CELLS AND TESTICULAR SOMATIC CELLS HAVE DIFFERENT SENSITIVITY TO CRYOPRESERVATION
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spermatogonial stem cells (SSC) are the foundation of spermatogenesis. Undifferentiated spermatogonia, containing SSC, represent only 2 to 5% of cells recovered from immature mammalian testis. Cryopreservation in liquid nitrogen allows for long-term storage of cells. Preservation of germ cells can serve as a means of genetic preservation from immature males when sperm storage is not an option. Studies have investigated the effects of cryopreservation on the spermatogenic potential of SSC and the efficiency of various cryopreservation protocols. Preliminary observations indicated that germ cells may survive cryopreservation better than testicular somatic cells, resulting in a post-thaw cell population enriched in germ cells. However, this has not been critically evaluated. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that germ cells are less susceptible to cryo-damage than testicular somatic cells. Cells were harvested from the testes of 1-wk-old piglets by 2-step enzymatic digestion. The initial cell suspension was subjected to differential adhesion to enrich the cell population for germ cells. Cells were plated in DMEM + 5% fetal bovine serum and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 in air. After 18 h, cells in suspension and cells slightly attached were recovered by trypsinization (1 : 10 trypsin-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) for 30 s and replated. This was repeated 24 and 36 h after initial plating. The enriched population was placed into cryovials at a concentration of 30 × 106 cells in freezing media (70% DMEM + 20% fetal bovine serum + 10% dimethyl sulfoxide), kept for 24 h at –80°C in a cryogenic freezing container and transferred to liquid nitrogen for 1 week. Aliquots of cells before freezing and after thawing at 37°C followed by incubation at 37°C in 5% CO2 in air for 1 h were analyzed for viability by propidium iodide (PI) exclusion and immunofluorescence for the germ cell marker VASA to identify viable germ cells (VASA+/PI–), nonviable germ cells (VASA+/PI+), viable somatic cells (VASA–/PI–), and nonviable somatic cells (VASA–/PI+). The percentage of viable germ cells after freezing and thawing was compared to the percentage of viable somatic cells by ANOVA. After enrichment by differential plating, the cell population had 95.6 ± 0.9% viability and contained 27.1 ± 7.4% germ cells (n = 3 replicates). After cryopreservation, the overall cell viability was 77.5 ± 1.6%, and 25.8 ± 8.0% were germ cells. The overall viability after cryopreservation could potentially have benefited from the 1-h incubation prior to analysis. The viability of the germ cell population after freezing and thawing was higher (92.1 ± 3.1%) than somatic cell viability (72.3 ± 1.7%; P < 0.01). These results indicate that porcine germ cells survive cryopreservation better than do testicular somatic cells. Therefore, cryostorage of germ cells can be an efficient means for preservation of male genetic material. Supported by NIH ORIP/DCM RR17359.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".