MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Finite volume element approximations of nonlocal reactive flows in porous media

2000· article· en· W1986267641 on OpenAlexaff
Richard E. Ewing, Raytcho Lazarov, Yanping Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueNumerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuperconvergenceMathematicsFinite element methodFinite volume methodNorm (philosophy)Mixed finite element methodFinite volume method for one-dimensional steady state diffusionRepresentative elementary volumeMathematical analysishp-FEMPorous mediumExtended finite element methodSmoothed finite element methodPartial differential equationFinite element limit analysisApplied mathematicsMechanicsBoundary knot methodPorosityNumerical partial differential equationsPhysicsThermodynamicsMaterials scienceBoundary element method

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, we study finite volume element approximations for two-dimensional parabolic integro-differential equations, arising in the modeling of nonlocal reactive flows in porous media. These types of flows are also called NonFickian flows and exhibit mixing length growth. For simplicity, we consider only linear finite volume element methods, although higher-order volume elements can be considered as well under this framework. It is proved that the finite volume element approximations derived are convergent with optimal order in H1- and L2-norm and are superconvergent in a discrete H1-norm. By examining the relationship between finite volume element and finite element approximations, we prove convergence in L∞- and W1,∞-norms. These results are also new for finite volume element methods for elliptic and parabolic equations. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Numer Methods Partial Differential Eq 16: 285–311, 2000

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations124
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNumerical Methods for Partial Differential EquationsSame topicAdvanced Mathematical Modeling in EngineeringFrench-language works237,207