MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986281820 · doi:10.1021/jo061491u

Solid-State Nitrogen-15 NMR and Quantum Chemical Study of<i>N</i>,<i>N</i>-Dimethylaniline Derivatives

2006· article· en· W1986281820 on OpenAlexaff
Glenn H. Penner, Andrea McCullough

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Organic Chemistry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced NMR Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubstituentChemistryDimethylanilineIsotropyNitrogenChemical shiftTensor (intrinsic definition)MoleculePhysical chemistryComputational chemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)CrystallographyStereochemistryPhotochemistryPhysicsOrganic chemistryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study the components of the nitrogen chemical shift (CS) tensor are examined for a series of para substituted N,N-dimethylaniline derivatives. This is done through measurement of the 15N NMR spectra of powder samples and through quantum chemical calculations on the isolated molecules. Experiments and calculations show that the isotropic CS, delta(iso), decreases with increasing electron donating ability of the para substituent, in agreement with previous solution studies. More importantly, this study shows that this decrease in the isotropic (solution) CS is due to decreasing values of the CS tensor component delta(11) and component delta(33). The component delta(22) is essentially invariant to the electron donating/withdrawing ability of the para substituent. Through Ramsey's theory of nuclear magnetic shielding, it can be seen that the variation in delta(11) and delta(33), and hence delta(iso), is due to changes in the n-pi* and the sigma-pi* energy gaps in N,N-dimethylaniline. This, in turn, is a result of the change in the energy of the pi* molecular orbital with change in the pi-electron donating ability of the para substituent. The effects of nitrogen inversion on the components of the nitrogen CS tensor components are also discussed. This study also shows the feasibility of performing 15N cross-polarization experiments on nonspinning powder samples at natural isotopic abundance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Organic ChemistrySame topicAdvanced NMR Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207