MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986297999 · doi:10.1080/00207590042000182

Contributing to world development: Research activities of the International Union of Psychological Science

2001· article· en· W1986297999 on OpenAlexaff
Pierre L.‐J. Ritchie, Michel Sabourin

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Psychology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAcademic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychological sciencePerspective (graphical)Diversity (politics)PsychologyPsychological researchScale (ratio)European unionPolitical scienceInternational psychologyEngineering ethicsApplied psychologySocial psychologyInternational tradeGeographyBusinessLawEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research activities of the International Union of Psychological Science are reviewed from the perspective of their broader contribution to world development. Characterized by diversity, they are also engendered by the Union's collaboration with major international organizations. Several recent projects are elaborated. The challenges of facilitating research and research networks on a global scale are also noted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Evaluation · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.090

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.014
Science and technology studies0.0060.010
Scholarly communication0.0170.010
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.126
GPT teacher head0.533
Teacher spread0.407 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
DomainEvaluation
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of PsychologySame topicAcademic and Historical Perspectives in PsychologyFrench-language works237,207