PLANTWIDE CONTROL STUDY OF A VINYL ACETATE MONOMER PROCESS DESIGN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A simulation of a vinyl acetate monomer (VAM) process design was developed and compared with the work of Luyben and Tyreus (1998 Luyben , M. L. and Tyreus , B. D. ( 1998 ). An industrial design/control study for the vinyl acetate monomer process , Comput. Chem. Eng. , 22 , 867 – 877 . [CSA] [CROSSREF] [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). Two incremental changes were made to the two main control substructures. Specifically, the two schemes focus on improving the liquid inventory system control and controllability of the azeotropic distillation column. The level control strategy was tested and found to produce a faster response with less oscillatory behavior. Two alternative control techniques for the azeotropic distillation column were tested, a feed-forward model predictive controller and a static feed-forward ratio controller. The model predictive controller results illustrated the large difference between the water composition analyzer sample time and the controller step size. The static feed-forward ratio controller showed excellent disturbance rejection of large feed flow variations to the azeotropic distillation column. Simulation results are presented to illustrate the effectiveness of the new control strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".