Heterogeneity of the 7q36 breakpoints in the t(7;12) involving <i>ETV6</i> in infant leukemia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The t(7;12)(q36;p13) is a recurrent chromosome abnormality in infant leukemia. In these cases, the involvement of ETV6, with disruption of the gene consistently at its 5' end, has been reported by several groups. A fusion transcript between ETV6 and HLXB9 has been detected in some, but not all, reported cases of t(7;12). We report here a study based on fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) mapping of the translocation breakpoints in seven patients and detailed molecular studies using Southern blotting on two of these patients. The FISH studies have shown a cluster of breakpoints within a cosmid contig proximal to the HLXB9 gene. Southern blotting analysis enabled us to define two distinct breakpoints within the area covered by the cosmid contig in two patients. The analysis of an unusual case of t(7;12)(q22;p13) [full karyotype: 46,XX,der(7)t(7;12)(q22;p13)del(7)(q22q36)] also revealed a break in 7q36, although in a region proximal to the overlapping cosmids. 5' RACE PCR in one patient has shown a rearrangement involving the ETV6 allele not involved in the t(7;12), suggesting that no functional ETV6 allele might be present in this case. These data show some heterogeneity in the distribution of breakpoints in 7q36, indicating that the generation of a fusion gene might not be the mechanism responsible for leukemogenesis in the t(7;12), at least in some cases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".