Effect of Processing History on the Sintering of Ethylene Copolymers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Polymer sintering plays a major role in processes such as rotational molding, governing the heating cycle and the properties of the final parts. There is evidence to suggest that the material molecular structure, molecular order and morphology are of importance in the sintering process. To date, however, there has been no satisfactory explanation as for their role in polymer sintering. One objective of this work is to examine the sintering behavior of ethylene copolymers under conditions related to the rotational molding process and to determine the relative effects of the polymer molecular structure and morphology on the sintering process. Sintering experiments were conducted under isothermal and non-isothermal conditions using both powder and cylindrical particles. It was found that the trends observed for the sintering of powder were consistent with the predictions of Newtonian sintering models. Sintering results obtained using cylindrical particles, however, showed significant differences not seen when using powder particles. These were attributed to the differences in the surface area between the two types of particles. It is speculated that the effect of material properties other than viscosity and elasticity are enhanced when cylindrical particles are used.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".