Metabolic cost and subjective assessment of palletizing and subsequent recovery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Twenty-one male blue collar workers repeatedly lifted (palletized) a box weighing 22 kg six times min(-1) for 5 min to a shelf of fixed height. The experimental conditions included two planes of lifting (symmetries), two shelf clearances, and three headrooms. The metabolic (heart rate, caloric cost and ventilation volume) and psychophysical variables (rate of perceived exertion, RPE; visual analogue score, VAS; and body part discomfort ratings, BPDR) were measured during resting, palletization, and recovery phases. In palletization the heart rate and metabolic cost ranged between 25 to 35% of the maximal aerobic capacity. Of the three factors only headroom had a significant effect on metabolic cost (p<0.02) and the BPDR for low back (p<0.05). In the recovery phase only headroom had significantly effect (p<0.001) on metabolic cost. The metabolic recovery took 10 min; however, recovery measured through psychophysical indices appeared to continue for 20 min.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".