Synthesis of N,C Bound Sulfur, Selenium, and Tellurium Heterocycles via the Reaction of Chalcogen Halides with −CH<sub>3</sub> Substituted Diazabutadiene Ligands
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of N,C bound chalcogen heterocycles from the reaction of chalcogen halides (ChX(n); Ch = S, Se Te; X = Cl, Br; n = 2, 4) with N-alkyl or N-aryl 1,4-diazabutadiene (DAB) ligands featuring methyl substituents on the backbone C-C linkage are reported. In contrast to what is observed for other p-block elements with the same ligand systems, which typically bind in an N,N' fashion, the chalcogens react with the ligand in an unusual manner, forming N(1)C(3)Ch(1) five-membered rings by incorporating a "backbone" methyl group. Solid state structures of the feature compounds have been confirmed by X-ray crystallographic studies. The reaction mechanism was probed by deuterium isotope labeling of the DAB ligand and analyzed using stopped-flow kinetics experiments, which supported attack by the olefin in the enamine form of the DAB ligand with concomitant loss of HX.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".