MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1986556868 · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2004.046821

Preanalytical Influences on DPC IMMULITE 2000 Intact PTH Assays of Plasma and Serum from Dialysis Patients

2005· article· en· W1986556868 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel T. Holmes, Adeera Levin, Barry Forer, Frances Rosenberg

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Chemistry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParathyroid hormoneInternal medicineRenal osteodystrophyMedicineImmunoassayEndocrinologyKidney diseasePopulationCentrifugationChemistryAntibodyCalciumImmunologyChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Measurement of intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) is essential to the diagnosis and management of metabolic bone disease (1), hypercalcemia, hypocalcemia (2), and renal osteodystrophy (3). The effects of specimen type, collection temperature, and storage temperature on the in vitro stability of PTH differ by method and platform (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10). Characterization of preanalytical effects unique to each method, platform, and patient population is important to prevent potential clinical misclassification. The Diagnostics Product Corporation (DPC) IMMULITE 2000 intact PTH assay is a solid-phase two-site chemiluminescent immunoassay with a monoclonal mouse capture antibody and a polyclonal goat signal antibody conjugated to alkaline phosphatase. The effects of preanalytical factors on this assay have been partially investigated. Underfilling of EDTA-plasma tubes decreased measured PTH in samples from both healthy persons and those with chronic kidney disease (CKD) (11). Storage of SST serum samples for 3 days at room temperature decreased measured PTH in SST serum samples, an effect not seen with EDTA plasma (6). Results from EDTA plasma paradoxically increased after storage at 4 °C (12). Despite evidence that PTH is more stable in EDTA-anticoagulated specimens (5)(6)(7)(9)(10), the manufacturer describes an instability associated with EDTA-plasma samples and therefore recommends cold (2–8 °C) collection, centrifugation, and storage until analysis (13).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Chemistry→Same topicClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control→French-language works237,207→