Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As will be seeu from the maps, R. angiocarpus is almost the only species of Acetosellcc in W. and S.W. Europe as well as i n America, Africa, Australia and E. Asia (Japan).The species R. tenuifolius is only found in the northern hemisphere in Europe and Asia, and it is most common in northern Europe and Siberia.I n alpine regions in Scandinavia this is the native species, and it is found in arctic regions in Siberia and Nova Zenibla.It is met with in E. Asia, but not in America, except Greenland.R. Acetosella s s t r . is also found in N. and E. Europe and Asia and in N.W. Alaska.In Siberia it is more southern than the last-mentioned species.111 Scandinavia it is met with as an introduced form in cultivated places, at road sides, etc. and in a native forin in some parts of the northern regions.The same form is also met with in Iceland and Greenland.It is named ssp.islandicrcs LOVE.R. !pnminifoliirs is found almost solely in arctic regions.According to previous research-workers it is only found in Alaska.Siberia, North Russia, Kola.Sachalin, and the Iiuriles.The present writer has, however, detected material of different forms of the species from Karelia onegensis, North Norway and N.E.Greenland, as may be seen on the map.These four maps show the total distribution of the subgenus Scetosella as known so far by the present writer.The distribution coincides with the theories on the differences in distribution of diploids
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it