MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986600131 · doi:10.4141/p00-029

Selected physiological responses of kudzu to different chromium concentrations

2001· article· en· W1986600131 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shounda L. Connell, Safaa H. Al-Hamdani

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHeavy metals in environment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKudzuPhotosynthesisChemistryChromiumShootPhytoremediationHorticultureChlorophyll aBotanyAgronomyBiologyEnvironmental chemistryHeavy metals

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study was designed to evaluate the potential use of kudzu (Pueraria montana var. lobata) as a phytoremediator to reduce Cr (VI) contamination. In addition, the effect of Cr concentrations of 4, 8, and 12 mg L–1 on kudzu growth, gas exchange, pigment concentration, and carbohydrate accumulation were evaluated. In general, Cr uptake by kudzu was increased as Cr concentration increased in the growing media. Most of the Cr taken up by kudzu was accumulated in the root as indicated by the significantly higher ratio of root/shoot Cr concentrations at increasing Cr levels in the root environment. Kudzu growth, photosynthetic rate, and chlorophyll a and b concentrations declined as the Cr concentration increased. The decrease in photosynthesis was independent of the internal carbon dioxide. Anthocyanin was found to increase as Cr concentration gradually increased from 4 to 12 mg L–1. Kudzu clearly demonstrated its ability to survive at Cr concentrations up to 8 mg L–1 in the root environment. Kudzu, therefore, can be considered as a replacement crop in areas of Cr contamination falling within the concentration range of this study. Key words: Carbohydrate, chromium uptake, photosynthesis, phytoremediation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant ScienceSame topicHeavy metals in environmentFrench-language works237,207