MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986611316 · doi:10.3386/w16012

The Impact of Health Care Reform On Hospital and Preventive Care: Evidence from Massachusetts

2010· report· en· W1986611316 on OpenAlexaff
Jonathan Kolstad, Amanda Kowalski

Bibliographic record

VenueNational Bureau of Economic Research · 2010
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealthcare Policy and Management
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreventive careHealth careHealth care reformMedicineFamily medicineGerontologyNursingPolitical sciencePublic healthHealth policyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In April 2006, the state of Massachusetts passed legislation aimed at achieving near universal health insurance coverage.A key provision of this legislation, and of the national legislation passed in March 2010, is an individual mandate to obtain health insurance.Although previous researchers have studied the impact of expansions in health insurance coverage among the indigent, children, and the elderly, the Massachusetts reform gives us a novel opportunity to examine the impact of expansion to near-universal health insurance coverage among the entire state population.In this paper, we are the first to use hospital data to examine the impact of this legislation on insurance coverage, utilization patterns, and patient outcomes in Massachusetts.We use a difference-in-difference strategy that compares outcomes in Massachusetts after the reform to outcomes in Massachusetts before the reform and to outcomes in other states.We embed this strategy in an instrumental variable framework to examine the effect of insurance coverage on utilization patterns.Using the Current Population Survey, we find that the reform increased insurance coverage among the general Massachusetts population.Our main source of data is a nationally-representative sample of approximately 20% of hospitals in the United States.Among the population of hospital discharges in Massachusetts, the reform decreased uninsurance by 36% relative to its initial level.We also find that the reform affected utilization patterns by decreasing length of stay and the number of inpatient admissions originating from the emergency room.Using new measures of preventive care, we find some evidence that hospitalizations for preventable conditions were reduced.The reform affected nearly all age, gender, income, and race categories.We also examine costs on the hospital level and find that hospital cost growth did not increase after the reform in Massachusetts relative to other states.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.037
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.134
Threshold uncertainty score0.267

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.037
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.334
GPT teacher head0.525
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations83
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNational Bureau of Economic ResearchSame topicHealthcare Policy and ManagementFrench-language works237,207