Site of alkylation of <i>N</i>‐methyl‐ and <i>N</i>‐ethylaniline in the gas phase: a tandem mass spectrometric study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
N-Methylaniline (NMA) was ethylated and N-ethylaniline (NEA) was methylated under chemical ionization conditions using C(2)H(5)I and CH(3)I, respectively, as reagent gases. The structures of the resulting m/z 136 adduct ions have been probed using metastable ion and collision-induced dissociation (CID) methods. From the similarity of the spectra obtained and from the presence of structure-diagnostic ions at m/z 59 (CH(3)NHC(2)H(5) (+*)) and m/z 44 (CH(3)NHCH(2) (+)), it is concluded that predominantly N-alkylation occurs in both systems. This interpretation was aided by the use of C(2)D(5)I and CD(3)I as reagents. Adduct ions of m/z 136 were also formed by ethylation of the isomeric toluidines and by methylation of the ring-ethylanilines. The resulting CID mass spectra were distinctly different from those obtained for the m/z 136 ions obtained by alkylation of NMA and NEA. Protonation of N-ethyl-N-methylaniline using CH(3)C(==O)CH(3) as Brønsted acid reagent produced an m/z 136 species whose CID mass spectrum also featured intense ion signals at m/z 59 and 44. This observation led to the conclusion that protonation with acetone as reagent results, in this case, in dominant N-protonation. However, the CID mass spectrum of the m/z 136 ion formed when CH(3)OH was the protonating agent featured a weak signal at m/z 44 and no signal at m/z 59. Hence it was concluded that the latter m/z 136 ion contains a larger contribution from the ring-protonated adduct.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".