Kinematics and Workspace Analyses of 3/3-RRRS Parallel Manipulator
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is known that two primary disadvantages of parallel manipulators are the complicated forward kinematics and limited workspace. This paper mainly addressed the kinematics and workspace analyses of a 3/3-RRRS 6-DOF parallel manipulator. After a brief introduction of the 3/3 -RRRS 6-DOF parallel manipulator, a three-dimensional model and its relevant structure diagram are constituted, the forward and inverse displacement analyses of the 3/3-RRRS parallel manipulator are discussed in detail, especially, a novel geometrical method referred as equivalent mechanism is proposed for the forward displacement analysis of the manipulator under consideration. Based on the displacement analyses of the manipulator, a discretization method is proposed for the computation of the reachable position/orientation workspace of the 3/3-RRRS parallel manipulator, respectively. Examples of a 3/3-RRRS parallel manipulator are given to demonstrate these theoretical results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".