Analysis of sensory, motor and cognitive functions of the coloboma (C3Sn.Cg-<i>Cm</i>/J) mutant mouse
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The coloboma mutant mouse (C3Sn.Cg-Cm/J) has been proposed as an animal model of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) because of excessive locomotion in the open field, yet few studies have looked at other behavioral measures in these mice. We analyzed activity levels of male and female Cm mice and their littermate controls (C3H) in two different types of open field, as well as their hearing (acoustic startle) and sensorimotor gating (prepulse inhibition), pain responsiveness (tail flick and hot plate), motor control (balance beam), motor learning (Rotarod), hippocampal working memory (spontaneous alternation in a Y-maze) and olfactory learning and memory (conditioned odor preference). We found hyperactivity and a lack of habituation in the small and large open fields and a deficit in prepulse inhibition in these mice, as well as a learning deficit in male Cm mice in conditioned odor preference but no deficits in pain perception or spontaneous alternation. Results from the rotarod and balance beam tasks indicate that Cm mice have severe motor co-ordination and balance problems compared to their C3H littermates, suggesting that Cm mice may be a more suitable model of ataxia than ADHD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".