The Determination of the Förster Distance (<i>R</i><sub>0</sub>) for Phenanthrene and Anthracene Derivatives in Poly(methyl methacrylate) Films
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Experiments that employ direct resonance energy transfer (DET) to obtain information about distances or domain sizes in polymer systems require independent information about the magnitude of the characteristic (Förster) energy transfer distance R(0). Values of R(0) are relatively straightforward to obtain by the traditional spectral overlap method (R(0)(SO)) for dyes in fluid solution, but are much more difficult to obtain for dyes in rigid polymer films. Here one can obtain a value for R(0) as a fitting parameter (R(0)(FF)) for donor fluorescence decay experiments for samples containing a random distribution of donor and acceptor dyes in the polymer film. In previous experiments from our group, we needed values of R(0) for various phenanthrene (Phe, donor) and anthracene (An, acceptor) derivatives. In this paper, we describe experiments which determine R(0) values by both methods for a series of Phe-An donor-acceptor pairs in poly(methyl methacrylate) and polystyrene films. Both the location of substituents on the donor and acceptor as well as the choice of the medium had an effect on the measured R(0), which varied between 2.0 and 2.6 nm. We also ascertained that there is some unknown factor, also prevalent in the work of others, which results in the Förster radius being larger when determined by the Förster fit method than by the method of spectral overlap.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".