MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986762455 · doi:10.1143/jjap.40.841

Degenerate Four Wave Mixing of C<sub>2</sub> in Forward Geometry: Spectral Lineshape Analysis and Temperature Determination

2001· article· en· W1986762455 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jung Jin Ju, Jae-seok Ryu, Chul Woung Park, Jae W. Hahn

Bibliographic record

VenueJapanese Journal of Applied Physics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMixing (physics)Rotational temperatureDegenerate energy levelsSpectral lineExcited stateChemistryAtomic physicsFour-wave mixingLine (geometry)Molecular physicsOpticsPhysicsNonlinear opticsGeometryLaserQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Forward phase-matched degenerate four-wave mixing (DFWM) spectrum of C 2 molecules is studied to determine the temperature of a premixed oxyacetylene flame. Both theoretical calculation and experimental measurement of the d 3 Π g ↔d 3 Π u swan band of C 2 are performed at weak field intensity. The measured spectra excited with a narrow band optical parametric oscillator (OPO) showed good matches with the results of calculations. When a DFWM spectrum corresponding to the molecular transitions of both high ( J =36–42) and low ( J =8–15) rotational levels is used for a Boltzmann plot, we can determine the flame temperature of 3143 K with a very small temperature uncertainty of 1.6%. In addition, the uncertainty in temperature measurement caused by the line interference of the DFWM spectrum in the forward geometry is estimated to be only 0.5%, which is negligible for practical applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.621

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJapanese Journal of Applied PhysicsSame topicSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207