MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract A185: Phase I clinical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic study of SB939, an oral histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi), in patients with advanced solid tumors

2009· article· en· W1986763134 on OpenAlexaff
Lillian L. Siu, Sebastién J. Hotte, Eric X. Chen, Hal W. Hirte, Jean Powers, Lee-Anne Stayner, Anne Iacobucci, Veronica Novotny‐Diermayr, Joy Zhu, Elizabeth A. Eisenhauer

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Therapeutics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHistone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research
Canadian institutionsJuravinski Cancer CentrePrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNauseaVomitingPharmacokineticsPharmacodynamicsAdverse effectGastroenterologyInternal medicinePeripheral blood mononuclear cellPharmacologyColorectal cancerCmaxCancerBiologyIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: SB939 is an orally available, potent, competitive HDACi selective for Class I, II and IV histone deacetylases. Preclinical evaluation of SB939 in a broad spectrum of xenograft mouse models revealed dose-dependent tumor growth inhibition. In the HCT116 colorectal cancer model, SB939 showed superior activity compared to other HDACi and prolonged histone H3 acetylation (acH3) in tumor tissues lasting ≥ 24 hours. Methods: Patients (pts) with advanced solid malignancies were enrolled into 7 dose levels (DL). At DL1, SB939 was taken on days 1-3 and 15-17 every 4 weeks, then on days 1-5 and 15-19 for other DLs. Detailed PK sampling was performed on cycle 1 days 1 and 5 (for DL1 on days 1 and 3). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were collected on cycle 1 at various time points for determination of acH3 levels using a validated Western blot assay. MTD was defined as dose with ≥ 2/3–6 pt with DLT. Results: To date, 28 pts have received a total of 72 cycles: median age 62 (range 48–88); F:M = 10:18; ECOG 0:1:2 = 7;17:4; tumor types = colorectal (15), neuroendocrine (3), gastric (2), lung (2) and others (6); prior chemotherapy regimens 0:1:2:3+ = 5:1:6:16. The most frequent non-hematologic adverse events (AE) of at least possible attribution to SB939 were (% of pts with all grade/gr 3+): fatigue (46%/7%), nausea (29%/0%), anorexia (21%/4%), vomiting (18%/4%) and diarrhea (11%/0%). Hematologic AE were all mild to moderate. DLT occurrence is described below, with the 90 mg DL declared MTD. PK analysis showed dose-proportional increases in AUC and Cmax. Elimination half-life is 6–9 hours. PBMC analysis for acH3 (lysine9/14) showed highest levels at 3 hours post-dose with return to baseline by 24 hours. The average relative acH3 levels at 70 mg dose level in this study are comparable to those obtained at 60 mg dose level in another phase I study of SB939, which evaluates a different schedule of thrice weekly (every other day) for 3 out of 4 weeks. Four pts (14%) received 4 or more 4-week cycles of SB939 (range 6–10). Conclusions: SB939 is well tolerated at up to 70 mg on this schedule of 5 consecutive days every 2 weeks. The 70 mg DL is being expanded and will likely be the RP2D. Phase II trials in prostate cancer and sarcoma are planned. Dose level Schedule Total no of cycles No of pts with DLT/Total no of pts DLT Other significant toxicity 10 3 days 6 0/3 - - Q2W 10 5 days 16 1/6^ - - Q2W 20 5 days 18 1/6 Gr 3 - Q2W myositis 30 5 days 19 0/4 - - Q2W 50 5 days 6 0/4 - - Q2W 70 5 days 5 0/3 - - Q2W 90 5 days 2 1/2* Gr 3 2 gr 2 N/V Q2W fatigue 1 gr 2 QTc ^ gr 3 bilirubin rise subsequently declared not drug related * neither pt completed a full cycle Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8(12 Suppl):A185.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.384 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer TherapeuticsSame topicHistone Deacetylase Inhibitors ResearchFrench-language works237,207