MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986765488 · doi:10.1364/ao.44.001601

Controlled frustration of total internal reflection by electrophoresis of pigment particles

2005· article· en· W1986765488 on OpenAlexaff
Michele Mossman, Lorne Whitehead

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Optics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicColor Science and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpticsTotal internal reflectionRefractive indexReflection (computer programming)Light scatteringReflectivityRayMaterials scienceParticle (ecology)Diffuse reflectionPigmentScatteringPhysicsChemistryComputer scienceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A model based on geometrical optics has been developed to describe the photometric observations associated with a novel method to control the reflectance of a surface. In this new reflectance modulation approach, electrophoresis of pigment particles is used to absorb light reflected by total internal reflection (TIR). The pigment particles are sufficiently small that they substantially do not scatter light, but rather they modify the effective refractive index at the reflection interface. An incident light ray interacting with this modified effective index is attenuated in a spectrally selective manner. Although frustrated TIR has been understood and used in various applications for some time, in this case it is used to substantially modify the color of the reflected light, which to our knowledge has not been previously reported. A numerical model of the pigment particle distribution has been developed to describe the observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied OpticsSame topicColor Science and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207