MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986819181 · doi:10.1139/p99-031

Comparative studies of the influence of hydrogen incorporation on the electronic properties of a-Ge:H films prepared by two different techniques

2000· article· en· W1986819181 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Y. Bouizem, J.D. Sib, L. Chahed, M.L. Thèye

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThin-Film Transistor Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermaniumAmorphous solidBand gapHydrogenDensity of statesSemiconductorRefractive indexSputteringAbsorption (acoustics)Absorption spectroscopyPhysicsGermaneChemical vapor depositionAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Spectral lineDeposition (geology)Atomic physicsThin filmOpticsCrystallographyCondensed matter physicsOptoelectronicsSiliconChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the results of a detailed investigation of hydrogen incorporation and optical absorption in the 0.6-1.3 eV range for two series of hydrogenated amorphous germanium films (a-Ge:H) deposited by reactive sputtering (series A) and by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition from germane (series B). Our results clearly show that the series A samples are characterized by a larger bonded hydrogen concentration (C H ), a more rapid gap variation with increasing C H , a smaller refractive index, and a lower density than the series B samples. We also compare in detail the energy distribution of the localized states in the pseudo-gap and the deep-defect states density as deduced from a decomposition of the optical absorption spectra based on a theoretical model for the gap states density in amorphous tetracoordinated semiconductors.PACS No.: 71.90

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score0.268

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicThin-Film Transistor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207