Influence of Soaking Temperature and Time on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Water Quenched Zr–2.5Nb Alloy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In heavy water cooled nuclear reactors, Zr–2.5Nb alloy is used for pressure tubes under cold worked and stress relieved (CWSR) condition in Canadian Deuterium Uranium (CANDU) reactors and under quenched and aged condition in RBMK and Fugen reactors. Because of its ease of use and the lower cost of fabrication, most of the work reported in literature is focused on the development and characterization of cold worked and stress relieved pressure tube material. However, recent work showed that the tubes manufactured using quenched and aged route showed a lower and predictable rate of in-reactor deformation during reactor operation as compared to those fabricated using the CWSR route. One of the important stages in the fabrication of heat treated pressure tube material is solution heat treatment (SHT), which governs the microstructure and hence, the mechanical properties of pressure tubes. Usually, SHT is carried out in two phase (α + β) region at a temperature closer to the β transus. The present work characterizes the influence of different SHT parameters such as soaking temperature (850, 870, and 890°C) and duration (15 and 30 min) on microstructure, texture, and Nb partitioning between phases and mechanical properties such as tensile properties, hardness, and fracture toughness. Fracture toughness parameters were determined as per ASTM standard E1820-11. Optical microscopy was used for microstructure, X-ray diffraction for texture, and EPMA for Nb partitioning investigation. The fracture surfaces were examined using SEM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it