Cell structure and stability of detonations with a pressure-dependent chain-branching reaction rate model
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We examine detonation waves with a four-step chain-branching reaction model that exhibits explosion limits close to the two lower limits of hydrogen–oxygen chemistry. The reaction model consists of a chain-initiation step and a chain-branching step, both temperature-dependent with Arrhenius kinetics, followed by two pressure-dependent termination steps. Increasing the chain-branching activation energy or the overdrive shortens the reaction length in the ZND wavelength and leads to more unstable detonations, according to multi-dimensional linear stability analysis. Corresponding numerical simulations show that detonations with weak chain-branching reactions have a wave structure similar to those with a single-step reaction; strong chain-branching detonations show distinct keystone features. Keystone regions are bounded by a discontinuity in reactivity across the shear layers emanating from the triple points at the intersection of the transverse waves and the main front. Especially in the strong case, chain-branching occurs within a thin front at the back side of the keystone figure, or immediately behind Mach stems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it