Cell structure and stability of detonations with a pressure-dependent chain-branching reaction rate model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We examine detonation waves with a four-step chain-branching reaction model that exhibits explosion limits close to the two lower limits of hydrogen–oxygen chemistry. The reaction model consists of a chain-initiation step and a chain-branching step, both temperature-dependent with Arrhenius kinetics, followed by two pressure-dependent termination steps. Increasing the chain-branching activation energy or the overdrive shortens the reaction length in the ZND wavelength and leads to more unstable detonations, according to multi-dimensional linear stability analysis. Corresponding numerical simulations show that detonations with weak chain-branching reactions have a wave structure similar to those with a single-step reaction; strong chain-branching detonations show distinct keystone features. Keystone regions are bounded by a discontinuity in reactivity across the shear layers emanating from the triple points at the intersection of the transverse waves and the main front. Especially in the strong case, chain-branching occurs within a thin front at the back side of the keystone figure, or immediately behind Mach stems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".