MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1987039078 · doi:10.1118/1.4814934

SU‐E‐T‐505: Monte Carlo Simulations for TrueBeam Using 4D IAEA Phase Spaces

2013· article· en· W1987039078 on OpenAlexaff
Julio Lobo, I A Popescu

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer AgencyUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTruebeamLinear particle acceleratorMonte Carlo methodComputer sciencePhase spacePhase (matter)Beam (structure)Synchronization (alternating current)Tracking (education)SimulationMedical physicsPhysicsOpticsMathematicsStatisticsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: To provide a tool for Monte Carlo simulations of dynamic beam delivery in the highly relevant situations where the full linac model is unavailable (such as is currently the case of the TrueBeam linac), which also includes the capability of reading and scoring 4D phase spaces. Methods: We have redesigned DOSXYZnrc source 20 to enable it to dynamically load a BEAMnrc shared library at run time and preserve synchronization between dynamic linac components and the beam motion in the patient geometry, even when starting from a phase space. We have enabled BEAMnrc and DOSXYZnrc to use the actual z coordinate of each particle, when reading a 3D IAEA phase space. Moreover, these codes can now read and output 4D phase spaces by reading/scoring the MU index of each particle. These 4D phase spaces can be used for further synchronization. Results: The updated source 20 has been validated, using film and ion chamber measurements (typically, differences around 1%), and comparisons with a commercial treatment planning system (3D gamma pass rates over 97% for a 3%‐3 mm criterion), for a variety of interesting clinical applications, including jaw‐tracking, non‐coplanar, and multiple‐arc VMAT, for both standard and flattening filter free (FFF) photon beams, starting from curved or general 4D IAEA phase space files. Conclusion: It is now possible to use source 20 for Monte Carlo simulations of TrueBeam and other modern radiotherapy technologies, starting from phase spaces (including curved or, more generally, 4D IAEA phase spaces). The simulations are performed in a single run, continuously, regardless of the complexity of the beam delivery. The new features have been extensively tested in clinical applications, with excellent results. The new 4D phase space capability could prove invaluable in other applications, such as in vivo portal dosimetry or adaptive planning. This work was supported, in part, by research grants provided by British Columbia Cancer Agency and Varian Medical Systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Physics→Same topicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques→French-language works237,207→