MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987040379 · doi:10.1063/1.1387262

Quantitative surface stress measurements using a microcantilever

2001· article· en· W1987040379 on OpenAlexaff
Michel Godin, Vincent Tabard‐Cossa, Peter Grütter, Peter J. Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicForce Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsAcadia UniversityMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCantileverDeflection (physics)Surface stressMaterials scienceModulusSilicon nitrideCalibrationYoung's modulusStress (linguistics)SiliconComposite materialOpticsOptoelectronicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A method for calculating the surface stress associated with the deflection of a micromechanical cantilever is presented. This method overcomes some of the limitations associated with Stoney’s formula by circumventing the need to know the cantilever’s Young’s modulus, which can have a high level of uncertainty, especially for silicon nitride cantilevers. The surface stress is calculated using readily measurable cantilever properties, such as its geometry, spring constant, and deflection. The method is applicable to both rectangular and triangular cantilevers. A calibration of the deflection measurement is also presented. The surface stress measurement is accurate to within 4%–7%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations99
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicForce Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207